Skip to main content

4 docs tagged with "randomness"

View all tags

Gambler's Fallacy

The Gambler's Fallacy is the mistaken belief that independent random events are influenced by previous outcomes β€” specifically, that a sequence of outcomes in one direction makes the opposite outcome more likely. It arises from a misunderstanding of randomness and the representativeness heuristic, and leads to systematically flawed predictions in gambling, investing, sports, and any domain involving independent probabilistic events.

Hot Hand Fallacy

The Hot Hand Fallacy is the belief that a person who has experienced recent successes in a random or semi-random process has a higher probability of continued success β€” that they are "on a hot streak" and will continue to perform well. First studied by Gilovich, Vallone, and Tversky (1985) in basketball, it is the mirror image of the Gambler's Fallacy, and its relationship with genuine skill-based streaks is more nuanced than originally thought.

Illusion of Control

The Illusion of Control is a cognitive bias where people believe they can influence outcomes that are actually determined by chance or external factors. First identified by Ellen Langer in 1975, this mental model explains why we develop rituals in gambling, why CEOs take credit for market-driven success, and why "placebo buttons" like disabled door-close switches persist. Understanding how to use Illusion of Control insights allows leaders and investors to separate genuine skill from environmental luck, leading to more robust risk management and realistic performance evaluations.

Narrative Fallacy

The Narrative Fallacy is a cognitive bias where individuals construct flawed, oversimplified stories to explain a series of complex or random facts. Popularized by Nassim Nicholas Taleb in 2007, this mental model explains our biological need to "compress" information into causal chains, leading us to underestimate the role of luck and overestimate our ability to predict the future. Understanding the Narrative Fallacy allows investors, historians, and leaders to avoid the "illusion of understanding" and build more robust strategies that account for the chaos of reality.